#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Relevance of level I neck dissection in oropharyngeal carcinoma


Authors: F. Campsie ;  Z. Horáková ;  Richard Salzman
Authors place of work: Klinika otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie hlavy a krku LF UP a FN Olomouc
Published in the journal: Otorinolaryngol Foniatr, 75, 2026, No. Ahead of Print, pp. 1-6.
Category: Původní práce
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccorl2026-003

Summary

Introduction: Comprehensive neck dissection involving level I is the standard of care for patients undergoing primary surgical treatment for clinically apparent cervical lymph node involvement. However, the current trend is to reduce the radicality of neck dissection in terms of the selection of dissected areas without compromising oncological radicality. Objective: To evaluate the risk of metastasis in level I based on the incidence of occult metastases in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma presenting with clinical lymph node involvement outside this region. These findings could contribute to refining the extent of neck dissections, specifically regarding the omission of level I from therapeutic neck dissections. Methodology and materials: This retrospective study analyzes the occurrence of occult lymph node metastases in level I. Out of a total of 229 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma treated between 2018 and 2022 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, 59 patients with metastatic lymph node involvement in levels II–V were selected. All of these patients underwent primary surgical treatment, which included comprehensive therapeutic neck dissection. Results: Occult metastasis was identified in level I lymph nodes in only 1 patient (1.6%), specifically in level IB. During the follow-up period (median of 30 months), regional lymph node recurrence in level I was observed in only 1 patient as part of multiple lymph node relapses. According to the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the estimated 3-year survival rate is 90%, with a 3-year recurrence-free interval probability of 76%. Conclusion: This study supports omitting dissection of level I from comprehensive block neck dissection, thereby preserving the submandibular gland and performing a wider exenteration of lymph nodes around level IIA.

Keywords:

surgery – Oropharynx – neck dissection – oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma – lymphatic metastasis


Zdroje
  1. Zumsteg ZS, Luu M, Rosenberg PS et al. Global epidemiologic patterns of oropharyngeal cancer incidence trends. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115(12): 1544–1554. Doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad169.
  2. Carpén T, Sjöblom A, Lundberg M et al. Presenting symptoms and clinical findings in HPVpositive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer patients. Acta Otolaryngol 2018; 138(5):513–518. Doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1405279.
  3. Coskun HH, Medina JE, Robbins KT et al. Current philosophy in the surgical management of neck metastases for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2015; 37 : 915–926. Doi: 10.1002/hed.23689.
  4. Vošmik M, Klozar J, Laco J et al. Konsenzuální doporučení České kooperativní skupiny pro nádory hlavy a krku (2019): definice resekčních okrajů, reportování krčních disekcí a vyšetřování HPV/p16. Otorinolaryngol Foniatr 2021; 70(1): 47–51.
  5. Lassen P, Lacas B, Pignon JP et al. Prognostic impact of HPV-associated p16-expression and smoking status on outcomes following radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: The MARCH-HPV project. Radiother Oncol 2018; 126(1): 107–115. Doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.018.
  6. Porceddu SV, Milne R, Brown E et al. Validation of the ICON-S staging for HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma using a pre-defined treatment policy. Oral Oncol 2017; 66 : 81–86. Doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.01.002.
  7. Rotnáglová E, Saláková M, Tachezy R et al. Vztah lidských papillomavirů a etiologie karcinomů patrových mandlí. Otorinolaryngol Foniatr 2010; 59(1): 32–37.
  8. Klozar J, Kratochvílová H, Saláková M et al. Nodal status is not a prognostic factor in patients with HPV-positive oral/oropharyngeal tumors. J Surg Oncol 2013; 107(6): 625–633. Doi: 10.1002/jso.23292.
  9. Shah JP. Patterns of cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg 1990; 160(4): 405–409. Doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05) 80554-9.
  10. Lim YC, Lee JS, Choi EC et al. Distributions of cervical lymph node metastases in oropharyngeal carcinoma: therapeutic implications for the N0 neck. Laryngoscope 2006; 116(7): 1148–1152. Doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000217543.40027.1d.
  11. Jose J, Coatesworth AP, Johnston C et al. Cervical node metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: prospective analysis of prevalence and distribution. J Laryngol Otol 2002; 116(11): 925–928. Doi: 10.1258/00222150260369471.
  12. Jose J, Coatesworth AP, Johnston C et al. Cervical node metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: prospective analysis of prevalence and distribution. J Laryngol Otol 2002; 116(11): 925–928. Doi: 10.1258/00222150260369471.
  13. Lim YC, Lee SY, Lim J-Y et al. Management of contralateral N0 neck in tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 : 1672–1675. Doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000184791.68804.0b.
  14. Koyfman SA, Ismaila N, Crook D et al. Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37(20): 1753–1774. Doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01921.
  15. Olzowy B, Herrmann E, Kramp B et al. Frequency of bilateral cervical metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 352 cases after bilateral neck dissection. Head Neck 2011; 33(2): 239–243. Doi: 10.1002/hed.21436.
  16. Zenga J, Jackson RS, Graboyes EM et al. Oncologic outcomes of selective neck dissection in HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2017; 127(3): 623–630. Doi: 10.1002/lary.26272.
  17. Wolff HA, Ihler F, Zeller N et al. (Chemo)radiotherapy after laser microsurgery and selective neck dissection for pN2 head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273(6): 1533–1541. Doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3619-4.
  18. Rodrigo JP, Grilli G, Shah JP et al. Selective neck dissection in surgically treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with a clinically positive neck: Systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44(4): 395–403. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.003.
  19. Van Abel KM, Moore EJ. Focus issue: neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. ISRN Surg 2012; 2012 : 547017. Doi: 10.5402/2012/547017.
  20. Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak TF et al. Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (#9501). Head Neck 2005; 27(10): 843–850. Doi: 10.1002/hed.20279.
  21. Lee SY, Lim YC, Song MH et al. Level IIb lymph node metastasis in elective neck dissection of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2006; 42(10): 1017–1021. Doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.12.023.
  22. Candela FC, Kothari K, Shah JP. Patterns of cervical node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Head Neck 1990; 12(3): 197–203. Doi: 10.1002/hed.2880120302.
  23. Weinstein GS, Quon H, O‘Malley BW et al. Selective neck dissection and deintensified postoperative radiation and chemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: a subset analysis of the University of Pennsylvania transoral robotic surgery trial. Laryngoscope 2010; 120(9): 1749–1755. Doi: 10.1002/lary.21021.
  24. Divi V, Harris J, Harari PM et al. Establishing quality indicators for neck dissection: Correlating the number of lymph nodes with oncologic outcomes (NRG Oncology RTOG 9501 and RTOG 0234). Cancer 2016; 122(22): 3464–3471. Doi: 10.1002/cncr.30204.
  25. Sanguineti G, Pai S, Agbahiwe H et al. HPVrelated oropharyngeal carcinoma with overt level II and/or III metastases at presentation: the risk of subclinical disease in ipsilateral levels IB, IV and V. Acta Oncol 2014; 53(5): 662–668. Doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.858825.
  26. Rassekh CH, O‘Malley BW Jr, Bewley AF et al. Feasibility and relevance of level I substation node counts in oropharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 2016; 38(8): 1194–1200. Doi: 10.1002/hed.24356.

Prohlášení o střetu zájmů

Autor práce prohlašuje, že s v souvislosti s tématem, vznikem a publikací tohoto článku není ve střetu zájmů a vznik ani publikace článku nebyly podpořeny žádnou farmaceutickou firmou. Toto prohlášení se týká i všech spoluautorů.

Grantová podpora

Podpořeno MZ ČR –⁠ RVO (FNOl, 00098892) a interním grantem IGA LF 2025-13.

ORCID autorů

F. Campsie 0000-0002-2857-110X,
Z. Horáková 0000-0002-3915-0968,
R. Salzman 0000-0001-5705-5510.
Přijato k recenzi: 1. 5. 2025
Přijato do tisku: 5. 8. 2025
MUDr. Filip Campsie Klinika otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie
hlavy a krku LF UP a FN Olomouc Zdravotníků 248/7 779 00 Olomouc
Štítky
Audiologie a foniatrie Dětská otorinolaryngologie Otorinolaryngologie
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#